[Freemint-list] FreeMiNT for 21st century

[Alan Hourihane]

On 16/01/17 10:47, Vincent Rivière wrote:
> On 16/01/2017 08:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> freemint-68k or m68k pigeon holes us to m68k at all times, and coldfire
>> is a superset of that, so I'm not keen on using 68k in the name.
> For information, in binutils vocabulary, "m68k" covers both 680x0 and 
> ColdFire processors. So it makes sense.

As mentioned to Miro, that makes sense in binaries, but not as a project
name.

> However, if FreeMiNT is going to support i386 or ARM (such as AROS), 
> indeed a name with m68k is limitative ;-)
>

Exactly.


Alan.