[Freemint-list] FreeMiNT for 21st century

[Vincent Rivière]

On 16/01/2017 08:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> freemint-68k or m68k pigeon holes us to m68k at all times, and coldfire
> is a superset of that, so I'm not keen on using 68k in the name.

For information, in binutils vocabulary, "m68k" covers both 680x0 and 
ColdFire processors. So it makes sense.

However, if FreeMiNT is going to support i386 or ARM (such as AROS), 
indeed a name with m68k is limitative ;-)

-- 
Vincent Rivière