[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Pwaitpid bug?

To: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
Subject: Re: Pwaitpid bug?
From: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 12:54:58 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu
In-reply-to: <19980424212540.06815@stud.uni-sb.de>

> - The MiNTLib (and actually almost every libc for every platform)
>   expects to find the signal number that caused a child process to
>   terminate in the lowest seven bits of the return value from
>   Pwaitpid (have a look at the macros WIFSIGNALED and WTERMSIG
>   in sys/wait.h).  MiNT currently disappoints these expectations.
>   I've changed this now.  The MiNTLib doesn't have to modified
>   for that. Any other programs that would get into problems?

Diffs? :)

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
|mail: draco@mi.com.pl                  | Atari Falcon030/TT030/65XE |
|http://www.orient.uw.edu.pl/~conradus/ |  *** FreeMiNT 1.14.7. ***  |

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** U pospolstwa normalne jest, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pwaitpid bug?
  - From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

References:
- Pwaitpid bug?
  - From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Ssystem bug
Next by Date: Compiling with PureC
Previous by thread: Pwaitpid bug?
Next by thread: Re: Pwaitpid bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread