Re: [MiNT] libpng 1.5.9

To: <ole@monochrom.net>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] libpng 1.5.9
From: m0n0 <ole@monochrom.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:02:59 +0100
Cc: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
In-reply-to: <974ebb6f075d6dec73b21f8c1a712467-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXkF0AVU6XFxdSEIKXVlaQA==-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <974ebb6f075d6dec73b21f8c1a712467-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXkF0AVU6XFxdSEIKXVlaQA==-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
Reply-to: ole@monochrom.net
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Host Europe Webmailer/2.0

Am Dienstag, den 21.02.2012, 00:58 +0100 schrieb m0n0<ole@monochrom.net>:

So, now it looks like we can put up an libpng 1.5 rpm for sparemint:)

Argh... the test cases ( make test -> especially "pngvalid --size" )was resulting in SIGBUS in free() ... :/


The comment for the last test in pngvalid is something like:

"memory corruption should be detected when freeing memory not belongingto libpng".

To me this sounds hard like this test will never ever work with systemswithout memory protection.


So I removed that test from the executable.

Greets,
m