Realistically we have.... 68000 (Stock ST) 68000+68881 (Mega STE with FPU) 68020 (Stock ST with accelerator) 68020+68881 (Stock ST with accelerator with FPU) 68030 (Stock Falcon) 68030+68882 (Stock TT) 68040 (Afterburner / Hades 040) 68060 (CT60 / Hades 060)
If we want all these targets, who is going to do the work to add all this additional support in MiNTLib? I guess it is not that much, but it is needed before GCC, IMHO.
I, also, see no point for 68020 and 68020/68881 if we are doing 68030 and 68030/68881, no stockAtari includes this CPU, and the rare machines that have them, not work the additional 2 targets IMHO. So, we'd have:
m68kmint (68000) m68881 (68000/68881) m68030 (68030) m68030fpu (68030/68882) m68040 (68040) m68060 (68060) m5475 (v4e)And this will definitely change the approach to building RPM packages, which will most likely end up being named like intel then (like above).
That is 7 targets. What about 68020-60? Is there still a point to this? Keith