[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Still don't get it - difference between 68020 and 68020-60
- To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] Still don't get it - difference between 68020 and 68020-60
- From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:16:20 +1000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K2gAuW6gLBAXNUraurAEJrJlOIWX6wgTua9l+OJBuNg=; b=Dgmze268KSAe/fQjAmKmAI30UiWg+P8n5ElLk3XFlszMcN1FlOS9e0bbN/bMIofka/ x30bQl9bjiThSv+NzZhGVcL2rDBC4ICukybGLC3mrO4gXMOzNfZCvXnTjJr+7Fy4DKXU o5H+JDLhhVxpxvLjxbw3pdxhgd3CJzzI6pKDM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=P9mLoWD+7AYKyJFR82QVJzCOJcZzxWPTBXFPfo7PoHIg5srXc6009pjtQ0zjbJBAXG OH2n6KDQOxT1P8SojT25xa4AGdMJflwpsqmCZkY4OoTSonJ81NNTM+q/rDWxzsWa+gA9 bkG7g/qpHurNXSVcbNqVFb1JteFQw7qSxPjIs=
- In-reply-to: <729ec3d897ff67cb50ea2269d3c5d33c-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXldoA1VcMl5dRkMKX1hZQFA=-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
- List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
- List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
- List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <729ec3d897ff67cb50ea2269d3c5d33c-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXldoA1VcMl5dRkMKX1hZQFA=-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
- Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:13 AM, m0n0 <ole@monochrom.net> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I passed -m68020 to gcc invocation, but gcc takes libs from m68020-60 -
> why is that? Would be nice if someone can explain it in one sentence :)
> As far as I understood the -m68020 is using the fpu, while 68020-60
> doesn't.
>
> Greets,
> Ole
>
so Ole is right in assuming:
""
the -m68020 is using the fpu, while 68020-60 doesn't.
""
Thats a question, and I presumue (if yes) it applies to ALL other non
68000 targets?
I just checked Wiki, it says 040 was the first with onboard FPU...
can someone clarify this. (what gcc is using with a specific target)
Paul