[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] RPM Targets for binaries
- To: ole@monochrom.net
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] RPM Targets for binaries
- From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:46:23 +0200
- Cc: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PzNPxVEXQD/yyqifMjpshGIqdcm7yE5d2KUxMjhY+PY=; b=mZEiqfqrHd+4fk/ogjlkf8gPQgLHQOyLoJ7IWgvFEv2OAH8O6Y0xcvF9RZwRCCAdX7 4LJFqeIevkM9DyXxrgHgdyyZLPDxGxr5C4SoGmjOu6ByHcfMTvyUdELXLYLWX/v+o3OE YA0fPHc258FBW5BDApEQr98qGUZSBLuPHng2M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xYmmzpx09MrMRPqbRYsnOfvbArWsY0zjcdXGeWb338nr63OBJIQNB0dP7Gm3/wQpey LQClfxDhlIWDa8xAqTTAwZsEIESWhcw6xRO/j0y+jWJarUktGWVpMGnPEIQkur00bVIG fq+f8hSwndq8X+hIz5kVh/eH8ndiXlo4Mthag=
- In-reply-to: <251a81da50cac24de9469ebb14574961-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXldoA1VcMl5dRkMKXl9ZQ10=-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
- List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
- List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
- List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <251a81da50cac24de9469ebb14574961-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUBFBDBTXF5bVkYJXldoA1VcMl5dRkMKXl9ZQ10=-webmailer2@server05.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
- Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
> Should I provide different RPM's for different machines?
> Keith talked about Multi-Architecture RPM's containing libs AND
> Executables, but providing RPM's that just contain executables is also
> unclear.
It wasn't solved as far as I remember. Basically, you should provide
at least default/68k version (without specifying architecture in your
spec file) and let rpm's config files handle this (i.e. what default
flags use etc). But better leave answer to Keith, as he was studying
this issue in better detail.
--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org