[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Still don't get it - difference between 68020 and 68020-60
> Was not the recently discussed OpenSSL the perfect example ? Howard clearly
> demonstrated it was unrelated to the FPU. The big gain was about superior
> 68020 abilities in 32 or 64-bit integer multiplications/divisions.
Are you sure about that? Not only that results were very inconclusive
(wrong numbers / multipliers) but as I understand it, gain was here
because of the asm version itself, not because of generated hardcore
020+ code by gcc. I bet when you create 000 asm version, gain will be
again minimal for 020. And final argument, you can use m68020-60 here
as well (as there is no FPU code), no need for m68020 :P
--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org