[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)

To: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 05:10:45 -0500
In-reply-to: <fbbaf0fb0812261726ieea2032vc1acda7e68a0e011@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Thread-index: AcloC2G1yH4jVp8YTRS8bmlfe9dc3g==
Thread-topic: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119

on 12/26/08 8:26 PM, Johan Klockars wrote:

>> That's fine.  More heads are better than one.  Having it on the CVS might
>> help it get some drivers down the road.
> 
> Not CVS in itself, since it's already been on that for years (with
> interruptions), but possibly the FreeMiNT CVS.

I was referring to the FreeMiNT CVS actually, this way it gets more
exposure. :)

-- 
Lonny Pursell    http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/

References:
- Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
  - From: "Johan Klockars" <johan@klockars.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] an urgent GEM question :-)
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] an urgent GEM question :-)
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] VDI? (was Re: an urgent GEM question :-)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] an urgent GEM question :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread