[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!

To: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:39:17 -0400
Cc: Mint List <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1126031886.6573.6.camel@joy.home>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1126029452.18656.37.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <1126031706.6573.4.camel@joy.home> <1126031886.6573.6.camel@joy.home>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 20:38 +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Petr Stehlik píše v Út 06. 09. 2005 v 20:35 +0200:
> > No.
> > 
> > fast alloc = do not clear RAM.
> 
> LOL, I've been too quick in guessing what do you mean by "fast alloc".
> Sorry. Konrad's answer is the correct one.
> 
> Petr

Indeed it would seem i've been confused as well.  This seems perfectly
reasonable that a program may need to run in ST-ram but can alloc
fastram or vice versa.  Blame the stupid porters (me :( ) ;) 

Thanks,
Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

References:
- [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
  - From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>
- Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Binutils FIXED!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread