Re: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues

["Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>]

> > The call only would allow to verify pointers. While the main evil thing is
> > that an AES with traditional design needs the memory protection to be
> > hacked and overridden, which in turn creates all sort of crap problems
> > with stability, signals, shutdown, exception handling and so on. That's
> > why the F_OS_SPECIAL facility _will_ be removed some day. You apparently
> > are the only one of the followers of this topic, who does not seem to
> > understand this.
> 
> And you seem not to understand that my suggestion completes the implementation
> of this flag, nothing more.

And you don't seem to understand that the flag's concept is about to be
abandoned, and not subjected a further development.

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
mail: draco@atari.org
http://draco.atari.org

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** Taka to juz natura pospolstwa, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.