[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GEMDOS re-entrancy

To: ekl@sdf.lonestar.org (Evan K. Langlois) (Evan K. Langlois)
Subject: Re: GEMDOS re-entrancy
From: Claus Brod <clausb@hpbeo79.bbn.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 10:04:55 MESZ
Cc: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu
In-reply-to: <m0q6noX-0000dhC@sdf.lonestar.org>; from "Evan K. Langlois" at May 26, 94 5:22 pm
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]

> I don't like Mag!x.  No pipes, no memory protection, no shared memory,
> no Unix tools (such as multi-user), no loadable device drivers or file
> systems,

Not *yet*, that is.

> and a limit of 16 processes.

Hmm, that's new to me. This is probably the limit for the number of
GEM programs.

--clausb@hpbeo79.bbn.hp.com-----------------------------------------------
Claus Brod, MDD, HP Boeblingen         Have you hugged your manager today?
--#include <std_disclaimer>-----------------------------------------------

References:
- GEMDOS re-entrancy
  - From: ekl@sdf.lonestar.org (Evan K. Langlois)

Prev by Date: Re: GEMDOS re-entrancy
Next by Date: Re: MiNT 1.11
Previous by thread: GEMDOS re-entrancy
Next by thread: GEMDOS re-entrancy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread