[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Taskbar area (was: Re: zTask Bug or maybe even kernel bug, or is it my fault?)
- To: mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] Taskbar area (was: Re: zTask Bug or maybe even kernel bug, or is it my fault?)
- From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:30:54 +1100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=H4wDDiJQN8PkdSBWzgOB4wQm8t7iQippg7PrGrgzpt8=; b=tHCjJyZAjTARNVHokgZQGR7VpFvsZZzmhzY7yCDvj8ou9f9yhOe5dbZHpZ356kxpjU lYzLs3HEpjNl3uTMfAG5/mm9BuqOkdTpCCpPkDWakMx4EFl2493/B/m0XqWOAiVaxIAv 5U28W3d2Gyb5tlw94y3StMFNIuq7oRc+G82fo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vOgzhetpg4Mi70iylLO9AoDglCgMozf5EwgmXK9VbcHGrvGDzgYzoJBE3yqyYhioQ4 tkQ6k5b4Y5xmKukuO4NgiRxuF9NO6VsRcZqMuCZBDOEhQLmEaqSXz3WHdIBBwYaRJDqv 4zotLul38lkaoi8C5Yhl2kDz3dQvKm2GwU++Q=
- In-reply-to: <1295104652.2233.29.camel@sterkenils>
- List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
- List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
- List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <AANLkTimqjtfUehFugn6CS2-dP=R6pqMYC=3R3XR7g6Td@mail.gmail.com> <000c0a9a.01c2b5f822cf@smtp.freeola.net> <AANLkTikepcAxGRjG5jomC3R+S=UX6w9NtC=NJSH=aDN9@mail.gmail.com> <1295083877.2233.23.camel@sterkenils> <AANLkTi=4i0rH4sXnnpex3s0ABE67bGuQ9Jdk1iHRyb-t@mail.gmail.com> <1295104652.2233.29.camel@sterkenils>
- Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 23:38 +1100, Paul Wratt wrote:
>
>> I wounder how well this would fit in with the config. I guess
>> something like an APP_OPTIONS always_topped option would be suitable,
>> with order being that in which "allways_topped" was registered, be it
>> via config, or XaAES menu/popup.
>>
>> How practical would this be to impliment?
>
> It has been implemented a long time ago. The "always on top"-option is
> set by the application when opening the window. Taskbar has supported
> this since 2006.
>
> Jo Even
>
so is the actual problem here that there is something undocumented in XaAES?
or is it a thing programmers use (as opposed to users)
Paul