Re: [MiNT] PML trouble with -m68020-60

[Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>]

Hi,

On perjantai 14 tammikuu 2011, Vincent Rivière wrote:
> The problem discussed here is about functions returning doubles into fp0
> instead of d0/d1. This never causes problems in the function
> *definition*. But it causes problems when the function is *used* if no
> prototype is given (register mismatch). Your warnings are useful to make
> clean function definitions and prototypes, but they don't warn about
> anything if the *caller* forgets to include the prototype.

Sorry, you're of course right.  I should avoid posting too late at night.
:-/


	- Eero

I wonder why the prototype checks aren't included even into -Wextra
though...