[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] gcc-code-generation

To: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] gcc-code-generation
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:06:38 +0100
Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <op.u6ubm6p6ofd6j1@descaro.cpe.ish> (Helmut Karlowski's message of "Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:48:32 +0100")
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <op.u6ubm6p6ofd6j1@descaro.cpe.ish>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux)

"Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de> writes:

> That means the compiler thinks to know that the stack is
> word-aligned. Is this the same with gcc4?

Stack alignment is part of the ABI.  If your stack is unaligned you are
violating the ABI.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- [MiNT] gcc-code-generation
  - From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] gcc-code-generation
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] wide characters
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc-code-generation
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc-code-generation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread