[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] QED
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Duckworth" <mduckworth@atari-source.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 11:50 PM
To: <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] QED
Seems I forgot the core of the question ;)
1. Would you like and use this (you already answered that)?
Maybe, depending on how good it is ;-) For a big project like FreeMiNT/qed I
would probably use something like this. For a small project I'm very happy
with the PureC IDE. It's fast, simple and gets the job done.
2. Should I build this into QED or fork QED to keep QED small and lean?
a) Fork qed.
b) Don't fork, but make it possible to compile a plain text-editor as well
as the complete IDE.
c) Don't integrate everything into one binary, but create several tools and
tie them together with a clever protocol.
Personally I'd prefer (c). It's easier to create several small tools than
one huge program. And it's easier to debug and easier to maintain. You will
get the project to a usable state quicker, and it would be easier to extend
it with new tools later on.
Jo Even
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4749 (20100106) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com