Re: [MiNT] QED

[Eero Tamminen <oak@helsinkinet.fi>]

Hi,

On Thursday 07 January 2010, Jo Even Skarstein wrote:
> >>> c) Don't integrate everything into one binary, but create several
> >>> tools and tie them together with a clever protocol.
> >>>
> >>> Personally I'd prefer (c).
> >
> > I like  (c) too, but what about extending AHCC instead of QED?
>
> That is a great idea, but those who prefer other compilers might not
> agree. Personally I would love to see the AHCC IDE extended. I still
> have to get used to the toolbox-concept, but other than that AHCC is a
> really good IDE. If it had some tools to visualize the code structure
> (to aid navigation) it would be almost perfect for my needs.

I guess extending the AHCC IDE would mean making it more configurable,
also in regards to what compiler and text editor it uses...

But that of course depends on what Henk Robbers thinks about this idea. ;-)


	- Eero