[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] gcc for 060 + FPU bug solution?

To: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] gcc for 060 + FPU bug solution?
From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:52:47 +0100
In-reply-to: <c6533ef60802200632t5ce5a355ya86117caabab2119@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c6533ef60802200632t5ce5a355ya86117caabab2119@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

MiKRO wrote:

1. Maybe I've found bugfix for our FPU bug-- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00790.html


Wow, you're right !
That really looks like a solution to our problem !
I'm going to try that.

However, I tried the testcase with a recent snapshot of GCC 4.3, and itseems that the bug is gone... So I didn't try to find a fix.


Excellent job for having found that !

--
Vincent Rivière

References:
- [MiNT] gcc for 060 + FPU bug solution?
  - From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] gcc for 060 + FPU bug solution?
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Pilot link
Previous by thread: [MiNT] gcc for 060 + FPU bug solution?
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc for 060 + FPU bug solution?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread