Jo Even Skarstein wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi [mailto:mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi]On Behalf Of Martin ElsässerHere it is again. "Please dont implement new things. Anything new wont work on MagiC, N.AES". Incredible...This is the view of the OS developer: here is a new feature, use it! But an application developer wants, tha as much people can use the software as possible. And the number of MagiC/MagiCMac/MagiCPC, N.AES and SingleTOS users is a part that no developer can IMO ignore!Of course they can! All TOS/GEM developers do this for fun and doesn't have to take any commercial concerns. If I want to develop for XaAES only, I'm free to do so, and if XaAES makes it easier for me then I probably will... Jo Even
Very well put.
I prefer to use prgrams that I have written myself.
Most of them are not suited for publication but suit me well enough.
They will benefit from any new development if I wish and I dont
have to bother about backward compatability.
Nobody knows how many like me are around.
--
Groeten; Regards.
Henk Robbers. mailto:h.robbers@chello.nl
http://members.ams.chello.nl/h.robbers/Home.html
Interactive disassembler: TT-Digger; http://digger.atari.org
A Home Cooked teXt editor: AHCX