[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] question about socket calls

To: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] question about socket calls
From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:23:48 -0400
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0504181525010.13874@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0

on 4/18/2005 9:28 AM, Frank Naumann wrote:

> I don't understand what do you mean. You can for sure get/set the
> receive/send buffer size to increase performance (getsockopt/setsockopt).

Sorry, in my excitement I was up all night and failed to mention I was using
gluestik.  However, with all the chatter about CVS I remember know gluestik
is on the CVS, so I will look there.  ;-))

-- 
Lonny Pursell    http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] question about socket calls
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] question about socket calls
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] [Fwd: [Mint-cvs] [FreeMiNT CVS] cat/EDITOR/INCLUDE]
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] cvs commit announce mailing list
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] question about socket calls
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] question about socket calls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread