Re: [MiNT] xaaes: benchmarktest old vs new ?

[Olivier Landemarre <olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr>]

> > I'm a little bit surprising from MyAeS perf because It should be 
> > worst than XAAES, because it's a server and run always,
>
>
> As Kronos don't benchmark AES it's very unlikely that you see a 
> significant time consumption of an idle AES system on a fast machine 
> (as long the AES is clever enough to free the CPU from time to time :-))


yes I'm agree (but the CPU part of Aranym without JIT is already twice 
slower than my MagicMac on PM8600 at 300Mhz, it's near a Milan  40 
computer), I have test with MMU option 10 time slower, I have find 
diffrence! but not so much (XAAES : 58, MyAeS : 55) It's like I thought, 
so I'm confort with Kronos test.

Olivier

>