Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS

[Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>]

Hi!

Well, IMHO the newfatfs should be compatible (from the user/app 
perspective) to the old TOSFS (not counting obvious bugs, of course).

So... users were used to that only a single filename extension is used 
no matter what is behind. IMO the newfatfs should handle that the same way.

And in case there is a trailing '.' than it is the same as the same 
filename without extension.

remember: all this applies for pure 8+3 filesystems only.

regards

STan


Frank Naumann wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > This looks like another problem presented by GFA editor which adds 
> > ".GFA" to the name even when it already contains an extension and 
> > therefore it is not found also on NEWFATS non-VFAT 8+3 partitions.
> >
> > Isn't it a time to fix that? ;)
>
>
> I don't understand how this is related to Konrad's problem. If GFA 
> editor mean it need to construct esoteric filenames that don't exist 
> it's a problem of the editor. Or what do you mean here?
>
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
> --
> ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060
> -----------------------------------------
> http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
> e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de