[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] ext2fs maintanance

To: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] ext2fs maintanance
From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:39:04 +0100 (CET)
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212161457050.9764-100000@mail.idoox.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Hello!

> patches). The differences in the sources there are quite large even now. I
> was thinking about ext3 port.

Btw. this is mainly not a question of the xfs itself. Just porting some
ext3 code from the linux driver is not enough. The ext3 mechanism need a
much more powerfull block cache that support the required functionality.
But this require non-blocking I/O to get an reasonable performance and so
on ...


Tschuess
   ...Frank

--
ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 060
-----------------------------------------
http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de

References:
- [MiNT] ext2fs maintanance
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] ext2fs maintanance
Next by Date: [MiNT] delete and undelete
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] ext2fs maintanance
Next by thread: [MiNT] delete and undelete
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread