[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.
From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 12:41:25 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205291045590.30134-100000@mail.idoox.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

> Can anyone explain me the major differences between the SLB and LDG shared 
> libraries? Could you name the more suitable one to have a system component 
> architecture based on? Maybe SLB because we already have the GEMDOS 
> binding? What should we choose?

What is LDG?

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
mail: draco@atari.org
http://draco.atari.org

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** Taka to juz natura pospolstwa, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>

References:
- [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.
Previous by thread: [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] SLB vs LDG shred libs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread