[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] broken LD

To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] broken LD
From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@freemint.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 18:46:51 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.10004051935160.491-100000@rakas>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Hello!

> As it turns out, for some silly reason, the new LD only seems to
> work with GCC 2.91.66, which is a problem because many packages
> are known not to compile correctly using any version of EGCS.

Interesting to hear. Which packages do you mean? Where do you get this
information?

90% of all rpm packages are compiled with egcs 2.91.66. Except some
earlier packages from Guido and the mbaserel lib packages.


Tschuess
   ...Frank

--
ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 060
-----------------------------------------
http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] broken LD
  - From: Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] broken LD
  - From: Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] broken LD
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] broken LD
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] broken LD
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] broken LD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread