[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Unix domain

To: MiNT <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Unix domain
From: Henk Robbers <H.Robbers@cable.A2000.nl>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 17:11:14 +0100
References: <383F3AC0.76BF1484@cable.A2000.nl> <19991128043257.N37@stud> <3842087E.9A5824AE@cable.A2000.nl> <38445F81.93FD8CE9@stud.uni-sb.de>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Hi

Guido Flohr wrote:

> Yes, a Pdomain(2) or a Punixdomain(!0) could solve some current
> problems, compatibility problems.  But it would certainly not shrink the
> kernel.

Not at the moment I suppose. The kernel is still not that big.
But, as I said earlier, it will give complete freedom to kernel developers.
In the mean time keeping simple AES users happy.

-- 
Groeten; Regards.
Henk Robbers.

http://people.A2000.nl/hrobbers/Homepage.html
Interactive disassembler: TT-Digger;       Experimental text editor: AHCX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Unix domain
  - From: Thomas <thomashuth@gmx.net>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Unix domain
  - From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

Prev by Date: RE: [MiNT] New kernel features
Next by Date: [MiNT] New kernel features
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Unix domain
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Unix domain
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread