[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] 040/060 MMU tree builder

To: Torsten Lang <tlang@dialup.becom.net>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] 040/060 MMU tree builder
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 23:13:23 +0200
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
In-reply-to: <m10lsuU-0000ngC@kermit.dialup.becom.net>; from Torsten Lang on Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:28:46PM +0200
References: <19990519190112.A20287@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de> <m10lsuU-0000ngC@kermit.dialup.becom.net>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 01:28:46PM +0200, Torsten Lang wrote:

> Since newer TOS versions that know TT-RAM (>=2.06) definitely have problems
> on >68030 systems without TT-RAM this was the easiest way to solve
> problems. Another point is that older programs using the ST-compatible IO-
> area won't trash any memory in use any more.

Huh? Can you clarify this a bit?

What exactly goes wrong in TOS when there is no TT-RAM at all (and the
ST-RAM is <16MB)?

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen

References:
- Re: [MiNT] 040/060 MMU tree builder
  - From: Thomas Binder <gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>
- Re: [MiNT] 040/060 MMU tree builder
  - From: tlang@dialup.becom.net (Torsten Lang)

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] FreeMiNT 1.15.1
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNT - Made By Internet Distribution
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] 040/060 MMU tree builder
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] 040/060 MMU tree builder
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread