Re: GEM and memory protection

[Kristoffer Lawson <setok@fishpool.com>]

On Mon, 25 May 1998, Konrad Kokoszkiewicz wrote:

> 
> The better solution would be to protect the shell against being killed 
> because of a faulty AV-client. If that is possible to do, I am all for
> such a solution. If not - well,... socialism died due to preferring nice
> theory over the reality.

I'll admit to not having followed the discussion closely, but wouldn't
a signal handler for SIGSEG do the trick?

         -     ---------- = = ---------//--+
         |    /     Kristoffer Lawson      |    www.fishpool.com
         +-> |    setok@fishpool.com       |  - - --+
             |-- Fishpool Creations Ltd - /         |
             +-------- = - - - = ---------      /~setok/